Welcome to the Journal of Modern Literature news and information site.


Check here for updates about our latest issues, calls for papers, submission guidelines and tips, as well special online-only content. Our issues themselves are available at Project Muse and are archived on JSTOR . Check out the "Read for Free" page to enjoy some featured content.



More than four decades after its founding, the Journal of Modern Literature remains a leading scholarly journal in the field of modern and contemporary literature and is widely recognized as such. It emphasizes scholarly studies of literature in all languages, as well as related arts and cultural artifacts, from 1900 to the present. International in its scope, its contributors include scholars from Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, Oceana, and South America.

Wednesday, May 21, 2025

BOOK NEWS: How Literary Suicides Expose Biopolitics

The Suicidal State: Race Suicide, Biopower, and the Sexuality of Population
By Madoka Kishi



Oxford UP, 2024

ISBN: 9780197690079

https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-suicidal-state-9780197690079?cc=us&lang=en#


The Suicidal State theorizes a biopolitics of suicide by mapping the entwinement between the Progressive-Era discourse of “race suicide” and period representations of literary suicide. Against the backdrop of the turn-of-the-century debates over immigration restrictions, “race suicide” suggests white Americans' low birth rate as foretelling an immanent extinction of the white race, prefiguring the contemporary white nationalist discourse, “replacement theory.” While race suicide personified the populational subject--the “race”--as a suicidal individual, Progressive-Era literature gave birth to a microgenre of literary suicides, including works by Henry James, Kate Chopin, Jack London, Gertrude Stein, and a series of Madame Butterfly texts.

BOOK NEWS is an online-only feature announcing new publications in modernist and contemporary literary studies. These announcements do NOT constitute an endorsement by the Journal of Modern Literature.

The Suicidal State argues that suicides in these texts literalize the fear of race suicide as they thwart the biopolitical demands for self-preservation, survival, and reproduction, articulating queer deathways that betray the nation's reproductive imperative. Both in its figuration of race suicide and in literary suicides, self-inflected death is imagined as a uniquely agential act in its destruction of agency, offering a fertile space for the reconceptualization of biopower's subject formation as it traverses individual and social bodies. That is, the book argues that suicide poses a limit case for the biopolitical management over life. Suicide, as it was imagined at the turn of the century, refuses, nullifies, and parries its obligatory relation to both biopower's discipline of the individual and its management of the population, thereby forging new forms of subjectivity and ways of being in the world that sidestep the twin imperatives for preservation and procreation. In tracking these queer potentialities of suicide, The Suicidal State offers a new history of sex and race, of the relation between individual and collective, of the formation of a biopolitical state that Foucault calls a “racist State, a murderous State, and a suicidal State.”

"Madoka Kishi's new book introduces a truly novel theory of queer biopolitics with an added bonus: the welcome arrival of an incisive intellectual historian. Taking seriously debunked ideologies of 'race suicide'-- and seriously taking them to historical task -- The Suicidal State mixes and mashes up literature, critiques of the state, and difficult questions of agency. With nimble readings of how this derided concept winds its way through fiction by Gertrude Stein, Henry James, and other luminaries, Kishi gifts us an exceptional, frequently startling account of reproduction, racialization, and the promising perils of social 'unbeing.'" -- Scott Herring, Yale University

"Madoka Kishi's remarkable new book reads white-supremacist anxieties about the threat of 'racial suicide'- a trope whose fatal echo shapes contemporary anti-immigrant discourse - against the backdrop of early twentieth-century literary suicides. Brilliantly weaving together American constructions of nationality, race, and gender with the pursuit of reproductive domination by persons of white European descent, The Suicidal State makes a dazzling case for viewing the choice of non-being as a response to the brutal political ontology that posits certain racialized subjects both as socially dead and as harbingers of death for the racial order of power on which American society rests. This is a must-read book for our times." -- Lee Edelman, Tufts University

"The Suicidal State shows us how the state came to long for the erotics of death in the Progressive Era: at the moment when self-murder became suicide and the body politic became the social body, race crossed with sex to deliver and imperil white reproduction. Kishi's arguments are a series of lapidary cuts that expose new desires that glitter with what they cut away, and each chapter presents a revelatory reading of a life canted toward collective death -- New England neurasthenic, Creole flirt, totemic Teuton, and the excretory American. The final turn to ill-fated Butterfly lashes this era to our present, and Kishi's understanding here -- brilliantly limpid and profoundly felt -- demonstrates, in her words, 'how to live on in a suicidal state.'" -- Josephine Park, University of Pennsylvania


Madoka Kishi is a professional in residence in English at Louisiana State University. She has translated Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick's Touching Feeling (2022), and co-translated Lauren Berlant's Cruel Optimism (2024) and Judith Butler's Parting Ways (2019) into Japanese. She has published essays in the Journal of American Studies, The Henry James Review, and the Journal of Modern Literature.

Friday, May 16, 2025

BOOK NEWS: Exploring artistic resistance in writing from and about India

Modernism and the Idea of India: The Art of Passive Resistance

BY JUDITH BROWN



Cambridge UP, 2024

ISBN: 9781009505246

https://www.cambridge.org/universitypress/subjects/literature/english-literature-1900-1945/modernism-and-idea-india-art-passive-resistance?format=AR


In his 1909 manifesto Hind Swaraj, Gandhi made an impassioned call for passive resistance that he soon retracted. 'Passive resistance' didn't, in the end, serve his overarching aims, but was troubled on multiple grounds from its use of the English phrase to the weakness implied by passivity. 

BOOK NEWS is an online-only feature announcing new publications in modernist and contemporary literary studies. These announcements do NOT constitute an endorsement by the Journal of Modern Literature.

Modernism and the Idea of India: The Art of Passive Resistance claims that the difficulty embedded in the phrase 'passive resistance,' from its seeming internal contradiction to the troubling category of passivity itself, transforms in artistic expression, where its dynamism, ambivalence, and receptivity enable art's capacity to create new forms of meaning. India provides the ground and the fantasy for writers and artists including Rabindranath Tagore, R.K. Narayan, Ahmed Ali, Amrita Sher-Gil, G.V. Desani, Virginia Woolf, and Le Corbusier. These artists and writers explore the capacities of passive resistance inspired by Gandhi's treatise, but move beyond its call for activism into new languages of art.

  • Provides inter-disciplinary reading of Indian modernism
  • Introduces new authors and artists to readers of modernist studies
  • Shows how Gandhi's idea of passive resistance is most relevant to Indian arts and literature


Judith Brown is associate professor of English at Indiana University, Bloomington, and author of Glamour in Six Dimensions: Modernism and the Radiance of Form.

Tuesday, May 6, 2025

BOOK NEWS: Tracing the love embedded in Black and Asian American literatures

Other Lovings: An AfroAsian American Theory of Life

By Seulghee Lee



Ohio State UP, 2025

ISBN: 978-0-8142-1509-8

https://ohiostatepress.org/books/titles/9780814215098.html


In Other Lovings, Seulghee Lee traces the presence and plenitude of love embedded in Black and Asian American literatures and cultures to reveal their irreducible power to cohere minoritarian social life. Bringing together Black studies, Asian American studies, affect theory, critical theory, and queer of color critique, Lee examines the bonds of love in works by Amiri Baraka, Audre Lorde, David Henry Hwang, Gayl Jones, Fred Moten, Adrian Tomine, and Charles Yu. He attends to the ontological force of love in popular culture, investigating Asian American hip-hop and sport through readings of G Yamazawa, Year of the Ox, and Jeremy Lin, as well as in Black public culture through bell hooks, Martin Luther King Jr., and Cornel West.

BOOK NEWS is an online-only feature announcing new publications in modernist and contemporary literary studies. These announcements do NOT constitute an endorsement by the Journal of Modern Literature.

By assessing love’s positive function in these works, Lee argues against critical regimes, such as Afropessimism and racial melancholia, that center negativity. In revealing what Black and Asian American traditions share in their positive configurations of being and collectivity, and in their responses to the overarching logic of white supremacy, Other Lovings suggests possibilities for thinking beyond sociological opposition and historical difference and toward political coalition and cultural affinity. Ultimately, Other Lovings argues for a counter-ontology of love—its felt presence, its relational possibilities, and its lived practices.


“Animated by theoretical erudition and historical attunement, Other Lovings is timely and perennial. Lee’s sensitive exploration of the overlapping frontiers between Afro-American and Asian American literatures, the romance of coalition and the labor of solidarity, and love’s fragility and sociality’s renewal is an extraordinary achievement.” —Fred Moten, author of All That Beauty

Other Lovings centers the ‘love bonds’ that make up Black and Asian American sociality. Lee thematizes the strongholds of racial melancholia, Afropessimism, and queer negativity in contemporary thought and offers a dazzling theory of the loving, ‘intramural mega-sociality’ of Asian American racial ontology and AfroAsian life.” —Vivian L. Huang, author of Surface Relations: Queer Forms of Asian American Inscrutability


Seulghee Lee (he/him) is assistant professor of African American Studies and English at the University of South Carolina. He is coeditor, with Rebecca Kumar, of Queer and Femme Gazes in AfroAsian American Visual Culture.

Thursday, May 1, 2025

BOOK NEWS: First major critical survey of Australian poetry

 

The Cambridge Companion to Australian Poetry

Edited by Ann Vickery



Cambridge UP, 2024

ISBN: 9781009470230

https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/literature/european-and-world-literature-general-interest/cambridge-companion-australian-poetry?format=HB


An invaluable resource for faculty and students in literary studies and Australian studies, this volume is the first major critical survey on Australian poetry. It investigates poetry's central role in engaging with issues of colonialism, nationalism, war and crisis, diaspora, gender and sexuality, and the environment. 

BOOK NEWS is an online-only feature announcing new publications in modernist and contemporary literary studies. These announcements do NOT constitute an endorsement by the Journal of Modern Literature.

Individual chapters examine Aboriginal writing and the archive, poetry and activism, print culture, and practices of internationally renowned poets such as Lionel Fogarty, Gwen Harwood, John Kinsella, Les Murray, and Judith Wright. The Companion considers Australian leadership in the diversification of poetry in terms of performance, the verse novel, and digital poetries. It also considers Antipodean engagements with Romanticism and Modernism.


Contents:

"Introduction" Ann Vickery

I. Change and Renewal

1. "Models of poet and nation" Philip Mead

2. "War, crisis and identity in Australian poetry" Dan Disney

3. "Cultivating Australian poetry through periodicals" John Hawke


II. Networks

4. "Above and below: sublime and gothic relations in nineteenth century Australian poetry" Michael Farrell

5. "Romanticism, sensibility, and colonial women poets" Katie Hansord

6. "Experiment and adaptation in Australia's modernist poetry" Aidan Coleman

7. "The postwar 'golden generation' (1945–1965)" Toby Davidson

8. "Generation of '68 and a culture of revolution" Corey Wakeling


III. Authors

9. "High delicate outline: the poetry of Judith Wright" Nicholas Birns

10. "Burning Sappho: Gwen Harwood's Incendiary verse" Ann-Marie Priest

11. "Les Murray: ancient and modern" David McCooey

12. "Lionel Fogarty's poetics of address and negative lyric" Dashiell Moore


IV. Embodied Poetics

13. "'The strength of us as women': A Poetics of relationality and reckoning" Natalie Harkin and Jeanine Leane

14. "'Country snarled/ in borders': spatial poetics in Asian Australian poetry" Kim Cheng Boey

15. "Australian poets in the countries of others'" Louis Klee

16. "Writing the Body" Orchid Tierney

17. "Not the poem: in media res" John Kinsella


V. Expanding Form

18. "Hybrid Forms: the verse novel, prose poetry, and poetic biographies" Cassandra Atherton and Paul Hetherington

19. "Electronic, visual and sound poetries in Australia" A. J. Carruthers


Ann Vickery is professor of writing and literature at Deakin University. She is the Author of Leaving Lines of Gender: A Feminist Genealogy of Language Writing (2000) and Stressing the Modern: Cultural Politics of Australian Women's Poetry ((2007)). She is also the co-author of The Intimate Archive: Journeys into Private Papers (with Maryanne Dever and Sally Newman, 2009).

Thursday, April 24, 2025

BOOK REVIEW: Is the Welfare State a Hegelian Legacy?

 


By Philip Tsang, Colorado State University

Benjamin Kohlmann. British Literature and the Life of Institutions: Speculative States. Oxford UP, 2022. 268 pp. $100.00 hardcover; $87.99 e-book.

 

Benjamin Kohlmann’s new book British Literature and the Life of Institutions enriches the bourgeoning scholarship on the welfare state in two distinct ways. First, it reassesses British literature from 1880 to 1910. For Kohlmann, this period is not one of crisis or decadence, a mere prelude to the high modernism of the 20s and 30s. Rather, the literature of this period evinces a sustained reformist aesthetic that imagines the state as a vital force in social life. Questioning the critical fixation on revolutionary rupture in modernist studies, Kohlmann attends instead to the “slow politics of reform” (2), a shared effort among late Victorian and Edwardian writers to rework and improve state institutions. As such, “the reformist literary mode is Hegelian rather than Marxist insofar as it imagines the gradual transformation of existing social conditions” (5). This is no casual observation, for Kohlmann proceeds to investigate the British reception of Hegel around 1900. His account of how British writers adapted Hegel’s speculative philosophy to reformist ends is his book’s second major contribution. His goal is not simply to trace Hegel’s influence on British literature; rather, he shows how literary texts take Hegel’s philosophy one step further by giving “abstract concepts a degree of experiential concreteness unattainable to philosophical thought alone” (5). For Kohlmann, speculation is no mere conjecture, but an effort of concretization.

British Hegelianism provides the theoretical groundwork for Kohlmann’s book. While previous studies of this loosely formed movement, such as those by Robert Stern and Peter Robbins, have explored British writers’ engagement with Hegel’s metaphysics, what distinguishes Kohlmann’s account is his focus on late Hegel. For Victorian readers, Hegel’s most influential work was neither the Phenomenology of Spirit nor the Science of Logic, but the Philosophy of Right, a book concerned with the role of state institutions. Kohlmann sees the selective reception of Hegel among British intellectuals as an advantage rather than a drawback because it allowed them to articulate a concrete vision of the state without the burden of metaphysics. The Philosophy of Right led those intellectuals, most notably Thomas Hill Green, David George Ritchie, Bernard Bosanquet, and Ernest Belfort Bax, to regard state institutions not as externally imposed structures but as shared forms of life that facilitate the thriving of individuals. Green, for instance, disputes Locke’s theory of individual freedom and instead argues for active citizenship and the common good to counter capitalist fragmentation. Similarly, Ritchie calls for the redistribution of property rights and for more state regulations of the economy. Kohlmann thus offers an important corrective to scholarly accounts of Hegelian philosophy as teleological and totalitarian. Those accounts are reductive because they have ignored how “Hegelianism attracted a wide range of ideological positions to itself, and that it managed to transform these positions in its turn” (36). This variety also characterizes Kohlmann’s literary case studies. In the remainder of his book, he explores how novelists and poets from a broad ideological continuum enfold Hegelian speculation into their responses to such diverse issues as the settlement movement, land ownership, taxation, and national insurance.

Given his investment in speculative thinking, it comes as no surprise that one of the key writers in the book is H. G. Wells. Kohlmann focuses, however, less on Wells’s early works of science fiction than on his lesser-known Edwardian novels, in which the author scales back his futuristic imagination to explore more local, gradualist possibilities of change. In particular, Kohlmann highlights Wells’s engagement with the tax reforms in the 1900s. His 1905 novel A Modern Utopia envisions a distant planet that shares many similarities with Edwardian Britain. The continuity between the two worlds allows for a critique and reimagination of existing governmental systems. Through this Hegelian style of “non-revolutionary reformist thinking,” Wells defends private property but also sees it as fluid and kinetic, amenable to public use through progressive taxation (168). The novel thus redefines utopia as a reformist rather than revolutionary genre: “Wells’s future-directed legislative utopianism entails the aspirational repurposing of the resources of the present, rather than a projection of radical revolutionary alterity” (165). Contrary to his earlier works, A Modern Utopia represents Wells’s “aspirational realism,” which entails a reworking rather than rejection of the status quo (176).

A more surprising choice for Kohlmann’s study is E. M. Forster, who seems to favor the spontaneity of interpersonal connection over any kind of state-level supervision. His 1909 tale “The Machine Stops” attests to his deep skepticism about centralized governance. Yet his 1910 novel Howards End, written in the midst of public debates that would eventually lead to the passing of the National Insurance Act in 1911, is more receptive to the benefits of institutional reform. For Kohlmann, the fact that Leonard Bast initially works as an insurance clerk and later becomes unemployed is not accidental; rather, it “raises broader questions about the social allocation of economic vulnerability and about the promise of publicly funded mechanisms of institutionalized care” (200). Howards End presents a world full of risk and uncertainty, epitomized by the novel’s pivotal event: Mrs. Wilcox’s sudden death. That misfortune teaches Margaret Schlegel that one cannot prepare for every danger and should instead embrace risk in order to live life to the full. Kohlmann, however, detects an irony in Margaret’s warning about the “tragedy of preparedness”—namely, that to live life unplanned and unprepared requires a safety net that provides material assistance during hard times. The Wilcoxes can lead an exciting and reckless life only because they have private insurance. Contrary to Margaret’s suggestion, the real tragedy here is the “tragedy of unpreparedness,” which “shows that life cannot be fully enjoyed unless it is cushioned against the worst kinds of socio-economic risk” (216). This reading exemplifies Kohlmann’s central argument: personal freedom and well-being are not threatened but rather protected and enriched by institutional mediation. Or, to drive home the Hegelian point, individual potential can be actualized only through the state. Kohlmann goes so far as to call Howards End a “welfare state novel” (191), reading its famous epigraph “Only connect…” not as some abstract ideal of interpersonal or interclass connection, but as a concrete reformist proposal for institutionalized care and economic redistribution. 

Throughout Kohlmann’s book, speculation is an ethos, a perspective, and a style that describes not only the literary works in question but also Kohlmann’s reading method. This style, as he puts it succinctly in relation to Ernest Belfort Bax, discloses “how substantive contradictions unfold from within—how they are ‘opened up’ for us by—a given situation” (55). Kohlmann’s speculative style allows for a wide interpretative latitude. In his reading of George Gissing’s 1887 novel Thyrza, he concludes that the protagonist’s uncompromising idealism prevents him from recognizing the possibility of institutional reform. That failure, however, becomes in turn “the very medium through which reformist hopes must be realized” (83). Kohlmann’s speculative reading recasts Gissing’s uneven novel as a polyphonic work in which a wide range of political positions are tested and negated. In a distinctly Hegelian fashion, he patiently shows how contradictions and instabilities within a text can lead to positive and generative outcomes. In the end, it does not matter what positions the authors take regarding taxation or insurance. Whether by supporting, critiquing, or decrying efforts at institutional reform, those writers engage in an act of speculation that is at once diagnostic, aspirational, and reparative. Kohlmann shows us that literary reading, too, can be a speculative act in itself.

I want to close with two questions. One is simply why British literature’s reformist imagination was so short-lived. According to Kohlmann, Edward Carpenter’s preoccupation with land reform in the 1880s gave way to an immersion in Hindu philosophy in the next decade; Wells’s ambitious agenda for redistributive taxation in A Modern Utopia gave way to a “claustrophobic vision of parliamentary infighting” in his 1911 novel The New Machiavelli (187); Forster followed Howards End with Arctic Summer, his “most sustained attempt to enter imaginatively into the reformist literary mode,” but he eventually abandoned the project (217). Like Wells’s A Modern Utopia, the reformist aesthetic’s all-too-short trajectory seems to be a narrative of “undeveloped possibilities” cut short by the advent of modernism. In Kohlmann’s account, interwar modernism signals a decisive break with the reformist aesthetic (69). Yet, in light of his speculative method, one wonders whether high modernism, despite its longstanding association with rupture and novelty, might share more continuity with the reformist imagination than Kohlmann presents here. Might war, revolution, and imperial decline have invigorated new styles of speculative institutionalism from Bloomsbury to Bengal?

My second question concerns the role of literature in state institutions. If, as Kohlmann powerfully shows, literature was the medium through which to cultivate the ethos of sharing and caring, might one make a stronger case for literature as a fundamental aspect of the state on par with taxation and insurance? One might recall that Leonard Bast is not just an insurance clerk but also an avid reader, though his primary goal is self-improvement. Yet if the Wilcoxes’ private insurance can buttress Howards End’s advocacy for national insurance, perhaps it is not too far-fetched to regard the ostensibly private act of reading as serving an institutional function toward the common good. What modes, practices, and pedagogies of reading are best suited to that end? This might be Kohlmann’s biggest provocation yet.

 

Philip Tsang teaches modernist and postcolonial literature at Colorado State University. He is the author of The Obsolete Empire: Untimely Belonging in Twentieth-Century British Literature, which traces an aesthetic of frustrated attachment in the context of imperial decline.

 

Monday, April 14, 2025

SPECIAL FEATURE: This Old Goose Still Honks: Dysfluency in William Carlos Williams's Late Poetry



William Carlos Williams was a rare poet who found fame and lived long enough to enjoy it, and yet, Jeffrey Careyva notes, "few learn about the series of strokes that knocked Williams down again and again during the height of his fame after World War II."

Read more about it in Careyva's post for the Indiana University Press blog, "This Old Goose Still Honks: Dysfluency in William Carlos Williams's Late Poetry."

The author's JML 48.2 essay on Williams is available FREE, linked in the post!

Wednesday, April 2, 2025

NEW ISSUE! JML 48.2 (Winter 2025) is now LIVE

 


Journal of Modern Literature issue 48.2 (Winter 2025), on the theme "Matter, Meaning, Material" is now LIVE on Project Muse at https://muse.jhu.edu/issue/54502


Content includes:

Enrico Bruno

Athleticism, Accommodation, and the Labor Question in Ellison’s “Afternoon” 


Grzegorz Kosc 

From Coinage Metallurgy to Fiat Money: Robert Lowell’s Poetic Evolution 


Sean Collins

Marianne Moore and the Environmental “Octopus” of Modernist Collage


Jeffrey Careyva

“The Mind and the Poem Are All Apiece”: William Carlos Williams and the Dysfluent Poetics of Aphasia 

FREE!


Frances Wear

To Worship Burning Art: T.S. Eliot’s “Little Gidding” as the Organon of F.W.J. von Schelling’s System of Transcendental Idealism


Enaiê Mairê Azambuja

The Tao of the Non-human: Ineffability, Materiality, and Ecosemiotics in Marianne Moore’s Assemblage Poetics


Bowen Wang

Vital Modernism: E.E. Cummings’s Still Life, the Quotidian, and Visceral Poetics 


Ryan Kerr

Anarchism and Misery in Austerity Britain: Alan Sillitoe, Samuel Selvon, and the Origins of Neoliberalism 


Reviews

Emily James and Ellie Lange

The Material Lives and Afterlives of World War I

 

Chen Lin

Giving Voice to the Hidden Muse: A Review of Lyndall Gordon’s The Hyacinth Girl 


Orchid Tierney

“The Age of Plasticene”: A Review of Ranjan Ghosh’s The Plastic Turn 


Cole Adams

Poetry After Criticism, Criticism After Poetry: A Review of The Academic Avant-Garde


Ramón E. Soto-Crespo

A New Realism for Perilous Times